Re: track_activity_query_size note
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: track_activity_query_size note |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevExX5i111ceG+9jmYwdbOd_Az3K6vw7wq+-4R6A=1XygeA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: track_activity_query_size note (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: track_activity_query_size note
|
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: > On 24 May 2012 13:54, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: >>> On 24 May 2012 13:39, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Thom Brown <thom@linux.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I attach a proposed change to the docs which points out that if the >>>>> size of track_activity_query_size is changed and the is server >>>>> restarted, it won't have any effect if query statistics are already >>>>> present. >>>> >>>> But aren't pg_stat_activity queries always cleared when you restart >>>> the server - because they are all disconnected... And you can't change >>>> track_activity_query_size without restarting. >>> >>> But not pg_stat_statistics queries, which is where I should have >>> probably made the note. Restarting the server won't change the length >>> of the field if there's already data present in pg_stat_statistics, >>> but upon resetting them, the field is appropriately sized. >> >> Uh, what's pg_stat_statistics? > > s/pg_stat_statistics/pg_stat_statements/ Ah, suddenly it makes sense. And in that case yes, the docs changes should go under pg_stat_statements, I believe. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: