Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevExSgusm5AAsmKSRQYai=tRiRB_pnSg0B6e0mMDiBCyAVQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: The buildfarm is in a pretty bad way, folks (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:19 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2018-04-06 23:12:19 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Daniel is working on investigating the isolationtester thing. See a mail on
> one of the threads where initial indications were the "atomics with no real
> atomics" (or whatever you'd call it) were to blame. We could redo that
> thing without atomics to get rid of that (and possibly should), but it
> would be good to figure out if it's actually broken first, so that part can
> get fixed if it is.
Is that an explanation for
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm= gharial&dt=2018-04-06%2019% 3A18%3A11
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm= lousyjack&dt=2018-04-06%2016% 3A03%3A01
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm= sungazer&dt=2018-04-06%2015% 3A46%3A16
? Those all don't seem fall under that? Having proper atomics?
No, sorry, bad wording. The initial indications were that, that's not the *only* indications. There is possibly/probably more than one thing.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: