Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevExORis_YOYW_XgksGPoQoUUbJso=GNVAJn20ZxwztoC7Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2 (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] WIP: About CMake v2
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote:
On 02/10/2017 08:27 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:For me a killer feature would be if/when we can get to a point where we can
have something pgxs-style on cmake that also works on windows.
Our homemade Windows build system works OK for postgres, and while ugly it
is as you say well tested by now. But it doesn't do *anything* to help
people build extensions on Windows.
Do we need to build PostgreSQL itself using cmake, to achieve that? Could we write something like pgxs for cmake, only for extensions?
I guess we wouldn't, but we'd still need the "replacement for autoconf" part. So then we're back to maintaining multiple buildsystems.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: