Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevExNkFCr0bn5=_2WP1gMomeBEsuf0okUCva+aiv30e0uNw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 06:29:24PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> > Testing maybe? I feel we have just avoided saying what you can and >> > can't do with the standbys and pg_upgrade, so I think we have to state >> > something. If we just want to say "recreate", let's say that. >> >> Well, the bottom line is we can'd do *anything* with a standby with pg_upgrade. >> >> Once you've promoted it, it is no longer a standby, and now you can >> use pg_upgrade. >> >> >> And I think the sentence about running rsync is extremely vague - run >> >> rsync where and how? What are you actually trying to suggest people >> >> do? >> > >> > Updated docs attached. >> >> I suggest just removing the rsync part completely. You're basically >> saying "you ca nset up a new standby after you're done", which is kind >> of obvious anyway. And if you're going to use rsync fromthe master to >> make a new standby, there's no point in running pg_upgrade on the new >> standby in the first place. > > I went the other direction and just said you can't upgrade a standby (as > a standby), and to just use rsync --- patch attached. Reads much better now. I'd say "use rsync to rebuild the standbys", but that's more nitpicking :) (And maybe "the simplest way" rather than "the simplest case"? But i'll leave that to someone who has english as their first language) -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: