Re: reconstructing old threads fun
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: reconstructing old threads fun |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEx=n8tKhbDcHuK8EYZCG8BJ1jPRaWs8u9MZZbZD2Znr_g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | reconstructing old threads fun (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: reconstructing old threads fun
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I just noticed a glitch in the algorithms for thread reconstruction. > See this thread: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/1290091189-sup-9738@alvh.no-ip.org > > in which I just found that the archives were incomplete. I had the > missing emails (since I was CCed), so I thought it'd be good to have > them in the public archive. So I bounced them to pgsql-admin. > > If you open the initial email, the thread dropdown doesn't list the > added emails. If you follow the "response" links at the bottom, you > won't reach the added emails. However, if you open the "flat" view, > they will definitely be there. > > Is this something that would manifest in other cases when emails in the > middle of a thread get added later than some later ones? This is not a > common situation, but it might happen if some emails in the middle are > moderated and later ones are not. That sounds more like a cache invalidation issue. Since I don't know exactly which of the emails had the problem - if you go back now, has it by any chance resolved itself already? AFAICT there's at least the same *number* of messages in the two lists now... -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: