Re: 10.0

<p dir="ltr"><br /> On May 13, 2016 23:27, "Joshua D. Drake" <<a
href="mailto:jd@commandprompt.com">jd@commandprompt.com</a>>wrote:<br /> ><br /> > On 05/13/2016 02:22 PM,
MagnusHagander wrote:<br /> >><br /> >><br /> ><br /> >> Using something like <year>.2.0 for
thesecond one in the same year<br /> >> could be suggested, but to me that sounds like the worst of both
worlds.<br/> ><br /> ><br /> > The amount of brain cycles, electricity, taxes on internet connectivity and
transcontinentaldata spent on the discussion of version numbers could have finished the release by now.<br /> ><br
/>> How about we just call it 9.6?<br /> ><p dir="ltr">I'm pretty sure most people aren't talking about this one
anymore,it's about the next one. I certainly am. <p dir="ltr">9.6 was pretty much decided when we put out the beta,
tbh.<p dir="ltr">/Magnus <br />