Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 2021-09 Commitfest |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEwudLhAiTKBpLz_FB=oOa045Kks_vGoPSJdHoJrmEuWXw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 2021-09 Commitfest (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 2021-09 Commitfest
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 3, 2021 at 3:48 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 7:31 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> That's the tricky part. It does not really make sense either to keep
>> moving patches that are waiting on author for months.
> I'm pretty sure this is the original reason for adding this -- to enforce
> that this review happens.
The CF tool is in no way able to enforce that, though. All it's doing
is making extra work for the CFM.
I've now deployed this: https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=pgcommitfest2.git;a=commitdiff;h=65073ba7614ba539aff961e59c9eddbbb8d095f9
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: