Re: pgfoundry references in docs

On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:21 PM, David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com> wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2012, at 9:15 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>> Not really. We have nowhere else to recommend, since we don't run a
>> replacement for it. And we really don't want to get involved in
>> listing all the different third party sites out there. (For example,
>> we had a reference to sourceforge.net in the same paragraph. And while
>> that was certainly "state of the art" when the docs were written, I
>> don't think anybody sane would recommend that today. The reality keeps
>> changing on those things, so it really doesn't belong in the docs). We
>> could put a set of links on the wiki if we want something "more live".
>
> Ah, then perhaps a link to such a wiki page would suffice. I think that would be a good compromise.

That can really be said for all of Appendix H in that case...
-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/