Re: "Bugs" CF?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "Bugs" CF? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEwqHGxwPpHCxp4y9OvSFX0xK7+LDWjtf4ooGwyjUE=esQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "Bugs" CF? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
-- Stephen Frost wrote:
> Magnus,
>
> * Magnus Hagander (magnus@hagander.net) wrote:
> > We could also use the category that we have now, or even create the concept
> > of a tag (where you can assign multiple ones). And then have a view that
> > brings together a view of everything with a specific tag/category,
> > *regardless* of which CF it's on.
>
> I like the tag idea.
+1
> > So the patch itself would live in whatever CF it was put in (or punted to),
> > but you can get a global view. Which with a filter would make it easy to
> > see "everything flagged as a bugfix that has not been committed". Which I
> > think is the main thing we're looking for here, is it not?
>
> The biggest issue that I see with this is, again, trying to make sure
> people know that they *should* put bug patches into the CF and make it
> clear *which* CF to put them into.
Maybe the answer to this is not to put it in any CF at all, and just
expect it to be seen through a tag view.
I think the way things are now, a whole lof ot things could break if a patch is not on *any* commitfest...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: