Re: Add wait event for log emission?
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Add wait event for log emission? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEwkHb_kJGqvFXrz4rTBnVfpr8+ABh-=Y0R3QTPAb2J7tA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Add wait event for log emission? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Add wait event for log emission?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 6:59 PM Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > > Hi, > > I just helped somebody debug a postgres performance problem that turned out to > be not actually be postgres' fault. It turned out to be because postgres' > stdout/stderr were piped to a program, and that program was slow. Whenever the > pipe buffer filled up, postgres stopped making progress. > > That's not postgres' fault. But we make it too hard to debug such an > issue. There's no way to figure this out from within postgres, one pretty much > needs to look at stack traces. > > I think we should add a few wait events for log emission. I think it'd be good > to have one wait event for each log destination. > > That's not perfect - we'd e.g. still not be able to debug where the logger > process is stuck, due it not being in pg_stat_activity. But other processes > reporting the wait event for writing to the logger process would be a pretty > good hint. +1. Would it make sense to at the same time create a separate one for syslog, or just use the same? -- Magnus Hagander Me: https://www.hagander.net/ Work: https://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: