Dynamic background workers & docs question
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Dynamic background workers & docs question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEwfE+FQvTCDwOJCOn2b7KdOaiV4PRdipgYzaSYN8bxUAw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: Dynamic background workers & docs question
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
<div dir="ltr">I was looking at <a href="http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/bgworker.html">http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/bgworker.html</a> witha client today.<br /><br />It says:<br />"Unlike RegisterBackgroundWorker, which can only be called from within the postmaster,RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorkermust be called from a regular backend."<br /><br />Is that the correct restriction?In particular, don't we allow calling RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker from another background worker? (In thelauncher/worker kind of scenario, like AutoVacuum).<br /><br />Also:<br />"Background workers are expected to be continuouslyrunning; if they exit cleanly, postgres will restart them immediately. "<br /><br />This doesn't apply to dynamicones, which we might want to clarify. Do we have a "term" for non-dynamic background workers? "static workers"?<br/><br /><br /><br />--<br /> Magnus Hagander<br /> Me: <a href="http://www.hagander.net/">http://www.hagander.net/</a><br/> Work: <a href="http://www.redpill-linpro.com/">http://www.redpill-linpro.com/</a><br/></div>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: