Re: More efficient build farm animal wakeup?
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: More efficient build farm animal wakeup? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEwZDM8+ze-ndA8ec95jmV9WrMauJFyJaUdUpoKqsu7SQg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: More efficient build farm animal wakeup? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:41 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 2022-11-21 Mo 15:58, Tom Lane wrote:
>> But if we're trying to improve matters in this area, this doesn't seem
>> like quite the way to go.
> Well, 5 minutes was originally chosen because it was sufficient for the
> purpose for which up to now the server used its mirror. Now we have
> added a new purpose we can certainly revisit that. Shall I try 2 minutes
> or go down to 1?
Actually, if we implement a webhook to update this, the server could
stop doing speculative git pulls too, no?
That would be the main point, yes. Saves a few hundred (or thousand) wasteful git pulls *and* reacts quicker to actual pushes. As long as you have a clear line of communications between the machines, it's basically win/win I think. That's probably why, as Thomas noticed earlier, that's what "everybody" does.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: