Re: IDLE in transaction introspection

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 13:18, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> This patch seems closing in on being done, but it's surely going to take at
> least one more round of review to make sure all the naming and documentation
> is up right.  I can work on that again whenever Scott gets another version
> necessary, and Magnus is already poking around with an eye toward possibly
> committing the result.  I think we can make this one "returned with
> feedback" for this CF, but encourage Scott to resubmit as early as feasible
> before the next one.  With some good luck, we might even close this out
> before that one even starts.

My hope was to get a quick update from Scott and then apply it. But
feel free to set it to returned, but Scott - don't delay until the
next CF, just post it when you're ready and I'll pick it up in between
the two CFs when I find a moment.


--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/