Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEwVsphx0vnKPOBjRHxhMZ0yrbmZjurLOuh+kWa91sP96Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint
Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting forcheckpoint |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>
> wrote:
>> ISTM the consensus is that there should be no output in regular mode,
>> but a message should be displayed in verbose and progress mode.
> Agreed, and applied as one patch.
Is there an argument for back-patching this?
Seems you were typing that at the same time as we did.
I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take your comment as a vote that we should back-patch it?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: