Re: [PATCH] Add an ldapoption to disable chasing LDAP referrals
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] Add an ldapoption to disable chasing LDAP referrals |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEwRjvyQL6cZ8uRZMGbA7H=RmemarxbpkxSQ5DRCdTT=dw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Add an ldapoption to disable chasing LDAP referrals (James Sewell <james.sewell@lisasoft.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Add an ldapoption to disable chasing LDAP referrals
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:30 AM, James Sewell <james.sewell@lisasoft.com> wrote:
Heya,I see what you are saying, the problem as I see it is that the action we are taking here is "disable chasing ldap referrals". If the name is ldapreferrals and we use a boolean then setting it to 1 reads in a counter intuitive manner:
That assumes that the default in the ldap library is always going to be to chase them. Does the standard somehow mandate that it should be?
"set ldapreferals=true to disable chasing LDAP referrals."
You'd obviously reverse the meaning as well. "set ldapreferals=false to disable chasing LDAP referrals."
Perhaps you are fine with this though if it's documented? It does work in the inverse way to pam_ldap, where setting to true enables referral chasing. pam_ldap works like so:not set : library defaultset to 0 : disable referral chasingset to 1 : enable referral chasing
That is exactly what I'm suggesting it should do, and I'm pretty sure that's what Peter suggested as well.
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: