Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEwHSy=oaimevRryg=sFC-0CSkyksFFt85BCM-uCAgfDsA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: gitlab post-mortem: pg_basebackup waiting for checkpoint
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:05 PM, Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de> wrote:
Hi,
Am Montag, den 27.02.2017, 16:20 +0100 schrieb Magnus Hagander:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 9:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Is there an argument for back-patching this?
>
>
> Seems you were typing that at the same time as we did.
>
>
> I'm considering it, but not swayed in either direction. Should I take
> your comment as a vote that we should back-patch it?
I've checked back into this thread, and there seems to be a +1 from Tom
and a +(0.5-1) from Simon for backpatching, and no obvious -1s. Did you
decide against it in the end, or is this still an open item?
No, I plan to work on it, so it's still an open item. I've been backlogged with other things, but I will try to get too it soon.
(This also includes considering Jeff's note)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: