Re: Blanks in the first line before the first word in the code boxes
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Blanks in the first line before the first word in the code boxes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEwERGXkKPvTnm=cTVF8TkqCy9KFuJdxuiqFyGN4D6JDMw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Blanks in the first line before the first word in the code boxes ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 3:21 PM, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
On Apr 3, 2018, at 10:55 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: On 4/3/18 09:12, Magnus Hagander wrote:I've pushed the fix and reloaded the 10 docs. I have not reloaded
earlier branches yet, but I'd be interested in some people reviewing a
bunch of pages in the 10 docs mainly to see if (1) it fixes all the
cases, and (2) it actually breaks some *other* cases.
It looks correct now.+1Did a spot check on known broken pages and chose some others atrandom. Viewed the 9.6, 10, and devel versions. 10 and devel bothlooked correct, and the 9.6 was broken where expected.The only thing I saw (and this may be something to look at the SGMLsource) was some blocks that looked overly indented, but it was consistentacross all versions. OnIf you search for "WITH RECURSIVE search_graph(id, link, data, depth)”the expression in the CTE is much more indented than similar CTEs aboveit.IMV I would not let this stop us from reloading the earlier versions as thatindentation is consistent across all versions (including 9.6, where it has theinitial indentation as well).
I've reloaded docs back to 9.3.
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: