Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEwDhR3NQDCchJeabwz2ugW+8vC+Q7Bu21GL_nS3gOHxBw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>) |
Ответы |
Re: Supporting Windows SChannel as OpenSSL replacement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> wrote:
On 06/09/2014 01:45 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:There was a patch set for this from Martijn van Oosterhout which was quite complete.Thoughts? While we're at it, we'll probably want to refactor things so
that it's easy to support other SSL implementations too, like gnutls.
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20060504134807.GK4752@svana.org
A lot has, unfortunately, changed since 2006. It might be a good startingpoint. But also actively starting from the point of "let's try to support multiple libraries" rather than "let's try to support gnutls" is probably also important.
I am interested in dropping the dependency on OpenSSL, if only to fix the situation with Debian, libreadline and OpenSSL[1].
That's one of the many reasons, yes :)
Obviously, we also have to do something about PQinitOpenSSL().
Unfortunately, I think it's too late to do that for 9.4 - otherwise it would've been good to have a whole cycle of deprecation on it...
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: