Re: Adding PgLife link
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Adding PgLife link |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEwCrMXJSatkW0too+=vcZPSKyyZNS+Nh1OCEAw7hCjhvA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Adding PgLife link (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Adding PgLife link
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:39 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 03:53:57PM +0100, Dave Page wrote: >> > That is not Bruce's decision to make, it is the decision of the >> > sysadmin team who are responsible for the maintenance and day to day >> > running of all postgresql.org services. The sysadmin team will only >> > provide hosting for services that can be properly and efficiently >> > managed. >> >> Huh - wrote that pre-coffee and just realised it may be taken the >> wrong way. I'm not saying pglife can't be properly and efficiently >> managed - I don't know, I have no idea how it's been built. Just that >> the sysadmin team would be looking at that before taking on another >> service to maintain. > > Agreed, and I don't think PgLife can be efficiently managed. PgLife > uses Perl, CPAN modules, Javascript, Procmail, and cron jobs, and these > would need to be maintained by the sysadmin team. Frankly, there > doesn't seem to be enough interest in even linking to PgLife, so I don't > see how having the sysadmin team maintain it makes any sense. IIRC, you explained it worked in part by pulling things from your personal mailbox. I don't see how that can ever be made to run anywhere else... -- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: