Re: 20th anniversary of PostgreSQL ?
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: 20th anniversary of PostgreSQL ? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEwB0a0w39=f2vzZABvLECoV-OiAW_0nMDVx+b5UvCrF_A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: 20th anniversary of PostgreSQL ? (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: 20th anniversary of PostgreSQL ?
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:28 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
-- On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 09:45:05AM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:38 AM, julyanto SUTANDANG <julyanto@equnix.co.id>
> wrote:
>
> I thought that were no Postgres 1.0 since Postgres is continuing Ingres,
> then Postgres95.
> Postgres started from version 6.0 to give credit of the past development
>
>
> PostgreSQL started from version 6.0.
> Postgres95 started from version 1.0 (though we can pretend it was 5.0)
> POSTGRES had at least versions 4.x. 4.2 was the last release.
Actually, I think Postgres95 had "5.X" in its $PGDATA/PG_VERSION, which
forced us to start PostgreSQL at 6.0, in case any applications were
looking there for version information.
Oh really? That's even more confusing than I thought, and I thought it was pretty bad :)
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: