Re: Online enabling of checksums
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEwAwhXdvX9Zjrosk977ijD7hGO0KGTKmSaSAgkur1j=cA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Online enabling of checksums (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Online enabling of checksums
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 9:04 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2018-03-01 12:56:35 +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> I've tried to rebase this patch to 10 and, despite minor rebase issues (oids, bgw_type, changes to specscanner), patch works fine.
> Do we provide backporting for such features?
Definitely not. With very rare exceptions (OS compatibility and the
like), features aren't backported.
Yeah. And definitely not something that both changes the format of pg_control (by adding new possible values to the checksum field) *and* adds a new WAL record type...
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: