Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEw=CDieE5eFG7PJG8ME4XLgvRmR8gLOO6PvG6O9iQHo6w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > Argh. This thread appears to have been forgotten - sorry about that. > > Given that we're taling about a potential protocol change, we really > should resolve this before we wrap beta, no? Had a chat with Heikki about this, and we came to the conslusion that we don't actually have to fix it befor ebeta. Because pg_basebackup is going to have to consider 9.1 servers anyway, and we can just treat 9.2beta1 as being a 9.1 from this perspective. We still have to fix it, but it' snot as urgent :-) FWIW, the main plan we're onto is still to add the GUCs on new connections to walsender, so we have something to work with... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: