Re: pg_lsn cast to/from int8
| От | Magnus Hagander |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_lsn cast to/from int8 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABUevEw6b7z+CHrywOF_3gXJU7kAYxCqZNbqETZnSJQFATVi_g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_lsn cast to/from int8 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_lsn cast to/from int8
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
On 2016-01-26 14:56:21 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Is there a reason we don't have casts between int8 and pg_lsn? AFAICT it
> works fine if I create the cast manually... Is it because of
> signed/unsigned if people have really really many transactions?
What for do you want that cast? Yes, the internally mostly share the
representation, but other than that, I don't really see why it's
interesting?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: