Re: Show sequences owned by
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Show sequences owned by |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEw1h0zmD4RyUc=+JPQ582+w-Yif8H4crkWi32jgm2LNzQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Show sequences owned by (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 15:29, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > * Magnus Hagander (magnus@hagander.net) wrote: >> If there is noone owning it at all, it just falls through the if/else >> block and ignores it if that happens (PQntuples() returns 0). > > Ah, right, but 'result' is still non-zero, ok. Yes, that's a regular libpq result set... >> Is there really a case for multiple sequences to own it? How would you >> go about making that happen? ALTER SEQUENCE.. OWNED BY.. only takes >> one table, afaics? > > I just noticed it was pulling from pg_depend and we could be creating > multiple dependencies on a single sequence by having two tables use it > as a default value. If that situation doesn't cause a problem for this, > then that's fine. :) Couldn't remember if we distinguished 'owned by' > from 'dependend upon' for seqeunces. I tried that now to be sure, and to confirm, this is the scenario: CREATE TABLE seqtest (a SERIAL PRIMARY KEY); CREATE TABLE seqtest2 (a int NOT NULL DEFAULT nextval('seqtest_a_seq'::regclass); In this case, we end up with just one entry in pg_depend, which refers to seqtest.a. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: