Re: Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6
От | Marti Raudsepp |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABRT9RDAgEL+KpErbOAfmTpQZCFp-UnWQa2QUHKr8kUCNUC5iA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6 (Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 19:06, Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> wrote: > Here's v6 of my expression caching patch. The only change in v6 is > added expression cost estimation in costsize.c. Ok, I found another omission in my patch. Up until v4, the behavior of estimate_expression_value() was to never insert CacheExpr nodes, and always strip them when found. In v5, I ripped out all the conditional CacheExpr insertion and stripping so expression trees would always be normalized the same way. This had an unintended consequence; operator selectivity estimation functions aren't prepared to deal with CacheExpr nodes. E.g. STABLE function calls and expressions with Params are constant-folded in estimation mode, but the constant would still remain as a child of a CacheExpr node. The solutions I considered: 1. Selectivity functions and other estimation callers could be changed to strip CacheExpr themself. This doesn't seem very attractive since there are quite a lot of them and it seems like duplication of code. 2. Strip CacheExpr nodes in the estimation pass. This has a potential hazard that estimate_expression_value() is no longer idempotent; a second pass over the same expr tree might re-insert CacheExpr to some places. However, these cases are unlikely to be problematic for selectivity estimation anyway -- currently selectivity estimation (and other callers) can only deal with trees that get folded to a single Const, and those don't get cached. 3. Strip CacheExprs *and* restrict CacheExpr insertion in estimation mode (like v4 patch). This would also add a larger amount of code to the patch, but it would keep estimate_expression_value() idempotent. ---- The attached patch implements solution #2 as it's the least amount of code and the downside doesn't seem problematic (as explained above). I also rebased the patch to current Postgres master (no conflicts, just some fuzz). Note that the create_index test fails in master, this problem isn't introduced by my patch. As always, this work is also available from my Github "cache" branch: https://github.com/intgr/postgres/commits/cache Regards, Marti
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: