Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"
От | Marti Raudsepp |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABRT9RBu=_pdUmy+VV6oDpZ8e1eg6u2oaR08WTDrze6W8ZgqwA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install" (Cédric Villemain <cedric@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install"
Re: PostgreSQL 9.3 beta breaks some extensions "make install" |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Cédric Villemain <cedric@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> a écrit : >>Did we ever do anything about this? It looks like the thread got >>distracted with VPATH builds and now I'm seeing this problem in 9.3.0. > Andrew is about to commit (well...I hope) a doc patch about that and also a little fix. > Imho this is a bugfix so I hope it will be applyed in older branches. Oh I see, indeed commit 6697aa2bc25c83b88d6165340348a31328c35de6 "Improve support for building PGXS modules with VPATH" fixes the problem and I see it's not present in REL9_3_0. Andrew and others, does this seem safe enough to backport to 9.3.1? > Apt.pgdg got the patch present in postgresql head applyed. Erm, isn't apt.postgresql.org supposed to ship the *official* PostgreSQL versions? Given that this issue affects all distros, I don't see why Ubuntu/Debian need to be patched separately. Does anyone else think this is problematic? By slipping patches into distro-specific packages, you're confusing users (like me) and bypassing the PostgreSQL QA process. PS: Where are the sources used to build packages on apt.postgresql.org? Regards, Marti
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: