Re: pg_stat_statements with query tree based normalization
От | Marti Raudsepp |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_stat_statements with query tree based normalization |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABRT9RAPfDuo5Y0a90bvZ_FLxZimQ4AxarEEtfAKRf2LucG_4Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_stat_statements with query tree based normalization (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 03:19, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > The results are...taking the median value of each set of runs as > representative, my patch appears to run marginally faster than head. > Of course, there is no reason to believe that it should, and I'm > certain that the difference can be explained by noise, even though > I've naturally strived to minimise noise. You should use the t-test to distinguish whether two data sets show a consistent difference or whether it's just noise. Excel/OpenOffice have the TTEST() macro for this purpose. For statistics doofuses like me, just pick mode=2 and type=3 as that's the most conservative. If the TTEST result is less than 0.05 then you have 95% certainty that the two dataset are consistently different. If not, you need more consistent data. More information here: http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/siegle/research/t-test/t-test.html Regards, Marti
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: