Re: BUG #19093: Behavioral change in walreceiver termination between PostgreSQL 14.17 and 14.18
| От | Xuneng Zhou |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #19093: Behavioral change in walreceiver termination between PostgreSQL 14.17 and 14.18 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CABPTF7UTsKk9FKJtGNgPK+SLoXqRN1=RGcsPM3NKOas72YUyqg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #19093: Behavioral change in walreceiver termination between PostgreSQL 14.17 and 14.18 (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #19093: Behavioral change in walreceiver termination between PostgreSQL 14.17 and 14.18
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi, On Sat, Nov 1, 2025 at 8:17 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 06:50:06PM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 11:16 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:07:01AM +0800, Xuneng Zhou wrote: > >> > Using a wrapper function seems better here. > >> > >> For a cleaner git history, the wrapper function and the assertion > >> should be split as its own commit, with the actual fix applied first. > >> Just an opinion. > > > > It makes sense to me. I've split the patch for HEAD into three patch > > sets. Please see the attached files. > > Thanks, that looks sensible. I'll revisit what you have at the > beginning of next week (local Tuesday) with a backpatch down to v13 in > mind. If others have comments and/or objections, please feel free to > chime in. > > Note that the changes in 040_standby_failover_slots_sync.pl are not > needed in v3-0001. No need to send an updated patch just for that. It's an oversight. Thanks for catching it. Best, Xuneng
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: