Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report
От | Pavan Deolasee |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABOikdPyDAZsjcBvYhA6Fu7AD42F+Wh_ovo2vBwM9Ttdt3_pTQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.3 Beta1 status report (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:I've noticed a few things:
> I will be working on polishing them for the next ten days, so any
> feedback, patches, or commits are welcome. I still need to add lots of
> SGML markup.
* Allow heap-only tuple updates on system tables (Andres Freund)
Didn't Andres just fix a bug wherein HOT updates usually wouldn't
occur on system tables following the commit of the foreign key locks
patch? While HOT's development occurred at a time before I followed
pgsql-hackers, I seem to recall someone telling me that Tom insisted
upon HOT working with system catalogs specifically because if it
wasn't good enough to work there, it wasn't good enough to work
anywhere, or something like that. I guess the source of the confusion
is specifically that at one point HOT really didn't work with system
catalogs. But, if I'm not mistaken, never in a released version.
Andreas reported and fixed a bug which was an oversight in the FK locks patch. I think he also discovered an old bug that the tableoid was not being properly checked for HOT conditions but that had very limited impact since its not common to have indexes on tableoids.
--
Pavan Deolasee
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee
Thanks,
Pavan
Pavan Deolasee
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: