Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavan Deolasee
Тема Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Дата
Msg-id CABOikdP94TY0ku257BFAPi-XprY9cQCHnBfRvEWcOh-z7yshdw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Ответы Re: Patch for fail-back without fresh backup
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:


 Will just have to figure out what we want the user interface to be like; should it be a separate guc, or somehow cram it into wal_level?


Yeah, I had brought up similar idea up thread. Right now wal_level is nicely ordered. But with this additional logic, I am not sure if we would need multiple new levels and also break that ordering (I don't know if its important). For example, one may want to set up streaming replication with/without this feature or hot standby with/without the feature. I don't have a good idea about how to capture them in wal_level. May be something like: minimal, archive, archive_with_this_new_feature, hot_standby and hot_standby_with_this_new_feature.

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: