Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables
От | Pavan Deolasee |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABOikdNMqDsc9GFSvpAiWB5tm6sTTkAaozbwkRB2e2UqOQ8zsg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE for partitioned tables
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
@@ -106,6 +120,9 @@ typedef struct PartitionTupleRouting
int num_subplan_partition_offsets;
TupleTableSlot *partition_tuple_slot;
TupleTableSlot *root_tuple_slot;
+ List **partition_arbiter_indexes;
+ TupleTableSlot **partition_conflproj_slots;
+ TupleTableSlot **partition_existing_slots;
} PartitionTupleRouting;
I am curious why you decided to add these members to PartitionTupleRouting structure. Wouldn't ResultRelationInfo be a better place to track these or is there some rule that we follow?
Thanks,
Pavan
Pavan Deolasee http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: