Re: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete
| От | Vladimir Sitnikov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAB=Je-HuM6t=8kiVCnqAisk3PfO9y7HmKWpzjCyDZWMXaeA5vg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete ("James Pang (chaolpan)" <chaolpan@cisco.com>) |
| Ответы |
RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete
RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete RE: Postgresql JDBC process consumes more memory with partition tables update delete |
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
> > Yesterday, when workload test, a lot of Postgresql JDBC connections
> > use 150-160MB memory , so we got ERROR: out of memory
Would you please share a reproducer? (e.g. DDL for the table, test code)
> > use 150-160MB memory , so we got ERROR: out of memory
Would you please share a reproducer? (e.g. DDL for the table, test code)
Have you tried capturing memory context information for the backend that consumes memory?
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: