Re: Q: regarding backends
От | Ian Lawrence Barwick |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Q: regarding backends |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB8KJ=iebhM3n_OJzHV-V-OMFbCp8UM1OYm0UurzRPpgvbstrg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Q: regarding backends (Stephan Fabel <sfabel@hawaii.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
2013/12/10 Stephan Fabel <sfabel@hawaii.edu>: > Hi all, > > and sorry if I'm asking a question that has been answered before; has the > PostgreSQL community ever considered different key/value backends (sort of like > MySQL with its many different options)? > > We'd be very interested in seeing the effects of integrating LMDB [*] in terms > of performance gains. Has this avenue been explored before? There was talk of pluggable storage at this year's PGCon (PGUncon?): https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/2013UnconfPluggableStorage but even if the idea gains traction, it's not going to arrive any time soon. As Kevin mentions, FDWs might provide a good alternative. An example with key/value stores I've been citing recently is this one: http://blog.cloudflare.com/kyoto_tycoon_with_postgresql Regards Ian Barwick
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: