Re: Bad sorting on source
От | Ian Lawrence Barwick |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bad sorting on source |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB8KJ=hkGJdypoVBL69Bv2fOvaNPkibrBqr7nSv6VtY_aRbk7w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bad sorting on source (Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bad sorting on source
|
Список | pgsql-www |
2014-02-18 15:41 GMT+09:00 Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>: > On 02/18/2014 06:35 AM, Ian Lawrence Barwick wrote: >> 2014-02-18 14:14 GMT+09:00 Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com>: >>> 2014-02-04 20:19 GMT+09:00 Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>: >>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Ian Lawrence Barwick <barwick@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> 2014-02-04 Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hey, >>>>>> >>>>>> When we go to download PostgreSQL from the website we show ancient >>>>>> versions >>>>>> first: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.postgresql.org/ftp/source/ >>>>>> >>>>>> We should show the current versions first. >>>>> >>>>> I get my source mainly from GIT these days, but now you mention it I've >>>>> been >>>>> annoyed by having to scroll down the growing list to find the latest >>>>> versions, >>>>> so +1 from me. I can put my keyboard where my mouth is if there's some >>>>> coding needed to fix this. >>>> >>>> >>>> I know somebody was working on this before, but I can't actually remember >>>> who it was :O >>>> >>>> I don't think I've seen a patch. >>>> >>>> Thus you are more than welcome to contribute :) git.postgresql.org, project >>>> is "pgweb" :) >>> >>> (...time passes…) >>> >>> Stupid question from someone not terribly familiar with Python frameworks - >>> the installation instructions say "django *version 1.4*", is 1.4 a >>> specific requirement >>> or would later versions work? (I have 1.5.1 available right now). >> >> OK, it looks like 1.4 is needed, I get a "No module named simple" error >> with 1.5.1. > > yeah - there is usually not a lot of testing done on newer/older > versions of python/django than what is in Debian Wheezy (or rather > Debian stable at a given time) because that is our deployment target for > production. Aha, I see. I was just floundering slightly due to previous 0% experience. Anyway got it working now with much less effort than I anticipated :) > Needless to say that we will also take patches for making it work with > newer versions as well to save us some time on the next upgrade ;) First things first… Django 1.4 seems to be a LTS edition anyway ;) Regards Ian Barwick
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: