Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes)
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTvb=_2-kaA6cmzp9zAAxD+vBDOMk8vv6VpO6LNCHXGpA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Default Roles (was: Additional role attributes) (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > Michael, > > * Michael Paquier (michael.paquier@gmail.com) wrote: >> Will there be any work on this patch for this commit fest or not? This >> is being carried around for a couple of months now with not much >> progress. This thread is idle for 4 months now. > > This thread and the other one kind of merged. The last update on the > overall discussion is here: > > http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150930111120.GM3685@tamriel.snowman.net Right. The CF entry links to two threads, and I somehow missed the first one. > Which was closer to 1.5 months ago and was the requested split of the > patch, which mainly needs to get review and/or buy-in from others on the > reservation of the role prefix 'pg_' (which is the first patch). > I'm happy to update the patches if they don't apply, of course, but > they're relatively straight-forward and we just need to agree that > reservation of the prefix is acceptable and then I can just commit > them. I'll reply directly on the other thread, there is no meaning to mess up things here. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: