Re: GinPageIs* don't actually return a boolean

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> We need to decide what to do about this.  I disagree with Peter: I
> think that regardless of stdbool, what we've got right now is sloppy
> coding - bad style if nothing else.  Furthermore, I think that while C
> lets you use any non-zero value to represent true, our bool type is
> supposed to contain only one of those two values.  Therefore, I think
> we should commit the full patch, back-patch it as far as somebody has
> the energy for, and move on.  But regardless, this patch can't keep
> sitting in the CommitFest - we either have to take it or reject it,
> and soon.

+1, I would suggest to move ahead, !! is not really Postgres-like anyway.
-- 
Michael