Re: [HACKERS] Reducing pg_ctl's reaction time
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Reducing pg_ctl's reaction time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTWWBEZ6NN_pbgmU=yn-HZNKGY3nAivvLSuLPe61n1KJw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] Reducing pg_ctl's reaction time (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Reducing pg_ctl's reaction time
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > The attached proposed patch adjusts pg_ctl to check every 100msec, > instead of every second, for the postmaster to be done starting or > stopping. This cuts the runtime of the recovery TAP tests from around > 4m30s to around 3m10s on my machine, a good 30% savings. I experimented > with different check frequencies but there doesn't seem to be anything > to be gained by cutting the delay further (and presumably, it becomes > counterproductive at some point due to pg_ctl chewing too many cycles). I see with a 2~3% noise similar improvements on my laptop with non-parallel tests. That's nice. +#define WAITS_PER_SEC 10 /* should divide 1000000 evenly */ As a matter of style, you could define 1000000 as well in a variable and refer to the variable for the division. > Barring objections I'd like to push this soon. This also pops up more easily failures with 001_stream_rep.pl without a patch applied from the other recent thread, so this patch had better not get in before anything from https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/8962.1498425057@sss.pgh.pa.us. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: