Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness

<div dir="ltr"><br /><div class="gmail_extra"><br /><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Tom Lane
<spandir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us" target="_blank">tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us</a>></span> wrote:<br
/><blockquoteclass="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">I
wrote:<br/> > Here's a rewritten patch that looks at postmaster.pid instead of<br /> > pg_control.  It should be
effectivelythe same as the prior patch in terms<br /> > of response to directory-removal cases, and it should also
catchmany<br /> > overwrite cases.<br /><br /></span>BTW, my thought at the moment is to wait till after next week's
releases<br/> to push this in.  I think it's probably solid, but it doesn't seem like<br /> it's worth taking the risk
ofpushing shortly before a wrap date.<br /></blockquote></div><br /></div><div class="gmail_extra">That seems a wiser
approachto me. Down to which version are you planning a backpatch? As this is aimed for the buildfarm stability with
TAPstuff, 9.4?<br />-- <br /><div class="gmail_signature">Michael<br /></div></div></div>