Re: WAL consistency check facility
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL consistency check facility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTVVUMKRq70XEyqSeRUi9nDEz2nUa5scTG97YF3vTJOQw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL consistency check facility (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WAL consistency check facility
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> I don't think you have the right to tell Kuntal that he has to move >> the patch to the next CommitFest because there are unspecified things >> about the current version you don't like. If you don't have time to >> review further, that's your call, but he can leave the patch as Needs >> Review and see if someone else has time. > > No complain from here if done this way. I don't mean any offense :) Seeing nothing happening, I have moved the patch to next CF as there is a new version, but no reviews for it. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: