Re: Regression tests for functions of info.c
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Regression tests for functions of info.c |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTUY1MShmedz4=p8-Qa_zk5My=xNv=e5BVvqQ9EF2_Tiw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Regression tests for functions of info.c (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 11:01 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote: > Hmm, that's fine as far as it goes, but surely we need to test that they > actually return correct data, not just the column names? The point of this test was to cover the issue related to the column names: e: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5315E622.2010904@ntlworld.com. If we want to test all those functions by checking their data, we will need roughly to either choose and/or create one/two table(s) with pk and fk, a procedure, a data type, and an index for SQLStatistics. I imagine that raw data will be more helpful than querying catalog in this case except for the data type. > I envisioned the "catalogfunctions" test case to eventually cover these, > although at the moment it only tests SQLTables. The ODBC standard calls > these "catalog functions", per > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms711722%28v=vs.85%29.aspx. From > that list, you're missing SQLColumnPrivileges and SQLProcedures. I lack of caffeine. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: