Re: CF3+4
| От | Michael Paquier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: CF3+4 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAB7nPqTUVmisYxF6y9EKu_6ZXfk6Q+5_6_5=rjjHpE4bk1uX8Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: CF3+4 (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: CF3+4
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:52 PM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
Michael Paquier
http://michael.otacoo.com
This seems sensible to me. 2012-11 is gone, whether truly finished or
not, and if everyone's OK with it I'd like to move all open work into
2013-01, close 2012-11, and open 2013-03 for post-9.3 work. That'll at
least provide a place for post-9.3 patches and consolodate everything
for somewhat easier tracking.
Is it really necessary to create a new commit fest just to move the items? Marking the patches that are considered as being too late for 9.3 should be just returned with feedback. The former patch writers, or people who want to pick up the old patches and resubmit them, will just need to move the items to the 9.4 commit fests once they are officially created.
-- http://michael.otacoo.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: