Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTSR189Yn54Zh2msVoaRmg84Nbz=T+zcvJWtUUTK=bkYw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool) (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 3:44 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:19 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@gmail.com> wrote: >> IMV the process is to post a patch to this list to certify that it >> is yours to contribute and free of IP encumbrances that would >> prevent us from using it. I will wait for that post. > > I attach my V3. There are only very minor code changes here, such as > breaking out a separate elevel constant for DEBUG2 traces that show > information of how the B-Tree is accessed (e.g. current level, block > number). Tiny tweaks to about 3 comments were also performed. These > changes are trivial. > > I've also removed the tests added, since external sort regression test > coverage is in a much better place now. Okay, moved to next CF. I may look at it finally I got some use-cases for it, similar to yours I guess.. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: