Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTRKt0zJZdMhuYZdXQrCNai5r7xWCoXkM-bkf1SnZU_9g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication. (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > Since we already released 9.6RC1, I understand that it's quite hard to > change syntax of 9.6. > But considering that we support the quorum commit, this could be one > of the solutions in order to avoid breaking backward compatibility and > to provide useful user interface. > So I attached these patches. standby_config: - standby_list { $$ = create_syncrep_config("1", $1); } - | FIRST NUM '(' standby_list ')' { $$ = create_syncrep_config($1, $4); } + standby_list { $$ = create_syncrep_config("1", $1, SYNC_REP_PRIORITY); } + | ANY NUM '(' standby_list ')' { $$ = create_syncrep_config($2, $4, SYNC_REP_QUORUM); } + | FIRST NUM '(' standby_list ')' { $$ = create_syncrep_config($2, $4, SYNC_REP_PRIORITY); } Reading again the thread, it seems that my previous post [1] was a bit misunderstood. My position is to not introduce any new behavior changes in 9.6, so we could just make the FIRST NUM grammar equivalent to NUM. [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqRDvJn18e54ccNpOP1A2_iUN6-iU=4nJgmMgiAgvcSDKA@mail.gmail.com -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: