Re: xlog min recovery request is past current point -- is it real problem?
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: xlog min recovery request is past current point -- is it real problem? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTQkW+FZYQbbPBoaoge1HkQCD7gxKfGGigF6E88mvYKfw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | xlog min recovery request is past current point -- is it real problem? (Sergey Burladyan <eshkinkot@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Sergey Burladyan <eshkinkot@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, All! > > I get this messages from new standby: > 2014-09-06 00:30:05 MSK pid=36409,user=,db=,host= LOG: restored log file "0000000A0001213C000000B1" from archive > 2014-09-06 00:30:05 MSK pid=36447,user=,db=,host= WARNING: xlog min recovery request 12149/A5149BA0 is past current point1213C/B1625590 > 2014-09-06 00:30:05 MSK pid=36447,user=,db=,host= CONTEXT: writing block 1 of relation base/16444/227548102_vm > > Is my data broken and I will get wrong query results or it just some > warning without any problem for data? This is similar to a bug report that has been sent a couple of months back: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1402313245515-5806482.post@n5.nabble.com Here is explained why it may happen because of the visibility map code: http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5395AB77.4080209@vmware.com But as of now, there have been no fixes submitted for that. As that's not the first bug report in the area, should we hasten a patch here? I don't mind working on that if that's necessary. Just that I won't be as fast as someone more familiar with the VM code :) > PS: > PostgreSQL 9.2.6 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2, 64-bit You should update to latest 9.2 version, which is now 9.2.9. Regards, -- Michael
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: