Re: [HACKERS] More stats about skipped vacuums

On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:55 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 2:09 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
> <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> Yes, my concern here is how many column we can allow in a stats
>> view. I think I'm a bit too warried about that.
>
> I think that's a good thing to worry about.   In the past, Tom has
> expressed reluctance to make stats tables that have a row per table
> any wider at all, IIRC.

Tom, any opinions to offer here? pg_stat_all_tables is currently at 22
columns (this takes two full lines on my terminal with a font size at
13). With the first patch of what's proposed on this thread there
would be 24 columns. Perhaps it would be time to split the vacuum
statistics into a new view like pg_stat_tables_vacuum or similar?
-- 
Michael