Re: Gather Merge
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Gather Merge |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTMH_fwXhyyH+eUdfNsqMmy5BJxkxPfCA+z7Aft3-h9wQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Gather Merge (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Gather Merge
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > + * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2015, PostgreSQL Global Development Group > + * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California > > Shouldn't this say just "(c) 2016, PostgreSQL Global Development > Group"? Are we supposed to be blaming the University of California > for new files? If the new file contains a portion of code from this age, yes. If that's something completely new using only PGDG is fine. At least that's what I can conclude by looking at git log -p and search for "new file mode". -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: