Re: [HACKERS] Speedup twophase transactions
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Speedup twophase transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTKbJXzUOheX9xcF9K6m-G5SmzN5A2CGkRB-_DtQ+dY3w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Speedup twophase transactions (Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Speedup twophase transactions
Re: [HACKERS] Speedup twophase transactions |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Nikhil Sontakke <nikhils@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>I look at this patch from you and that's present for me: >>https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMGcDxf8Bn9ZPBBJZba9wiyQq->Qk5uqq=VjoMnRnW5s+fKST3w@mail.gmail.com > >> --- a/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c >> +++ b/src/backend/access/transam/xlog.c >> @@ -9573,6 +9573,7 @@ xlog_redo(XLogReaderState *record) >> (errmsg("unexpected timeline ID %u (should be %u) >> in checkpoint record", >> checkPoint.ThisTimeLineID, ThisTimeLineID))); >> >> + KnownPreparedRecreateFiles(checkPoint.redo); >> RecoveryRestartPoint(&checkPoint); >> } > > Oh, sorry. I was asking about CheckpointTwoPhase(). I don't see a > function by this name. And now I see, the name is CheckPointTwoPhase() > :-) My mistake then :D >> And actually, when a XLOG_CHECKPOINT_SHUTDOWN record is taken, 2PC >> files are not flushed to disk with this patch. This is a problem as a >> new restart point is created... Having the flush in CheckpointTwoPhase >> really makes the most sense. > > Umm, AFAICS, CheckPointTwoPhase() does not get called in the "standby > promote" code path. CreateRestartPoint() calls it via CheckPointGuts() while in recovery. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: