Re: pg_dump -j against standbys
| От | Michael Paquier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump -j against standbys |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAB7nPqTJuGGK5jcH4FtrzoqAZRyjtzA1+r_rCeWZdEwnEDjbbw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_dump -j against standbys (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote: > On 5/24/16 6:27 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> pg_dump: Synchronized snapshots are not supported on standby servers. > > > Would it be that much harder to support this use case, perhaps by having the > replica request the snapshot from the master on the client's behalf? It > certainly doesn't surprise me that people would want to parallel dump from a > replica... For HEAD, I totally agree. However, it seems to me that what Magnus is looking for here is a backpatch that would allow users to get more useful information related to the error that's happening: pg_dump provides now an error that does not help at all in diagnosing what the problem is. And that is confusing. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: