Re: pg_shmem_allocations view
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_shmem_allocations view |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTFj9hck09iQ_1c+=dvPkYerVEViuHPtAoP-9OH4=Dqnw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_shmem_allocations view (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > Here's a rebased version. I remember why I didn't call the column > "offset" (as Michael complained about upthread), it's a keyword... Oh, an old patch resurrected from the dead... Reading again the patch + * Increase number of initilized slots if we didn't reuse a previously + * used one. s/initilized/initialized + Number of backends attached to this segment (1 signals a moribund + entry, 2 signals one user, ...). moribund? Or target for removal. REVOKE ALL .. FROM PUBLIC; REVOKE EXECUTE .. ON FUNCTION FROM PUBLIC; Revoking he execution of those views and their underlying functions would be a good thing I think, this can give hints on the system activity, particularly for DSM segments. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: