Re: DRAFT 9.6 release
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DRAFT 9.6 release |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTFZH=13d+t8rx4e33PRAFofMM4eKZfPAaePQkU5ucwuw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: DRAFT 9.6 release (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > On 08/30/2016 06:39 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> ??? It's always been possible for me to give multiple standbys the same >>> name, making a de-facto group. >> >> A "group" grammar, by that I mean an alias referring to a set of >> nodes, is not supported. And you can still define multiple entries >> with the same name. >> > > Yeah, so what happens in the case I described? Is the master just > looking for that number of commits, or is it looking for a commit from > g1 and from g2? How do you set up synchronous_standby_names in this case? Are multiple nodes using the same application_name, being either 'g1' or 'g2'? -- Michael
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: